Subgroup analyses may be misleading - Students 4 Best Evidence

Findings based on results for subgroups of people within a treatment comparison may be misleading. These analyses are often poorly planned and reported.

Credibility of claims of subgroup effects in randomised controlled trials: systematic review

Subgroup analyses may be misleading

Nutrients, Free Full-Text

PROTOCOL: Evidence‐informed practice versus evidence‐based practice educational interventions for improving knowledge, attitudes, understanding, and behavior toward the application of evidence into practice: A comprehensive systematic review of

Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead by Goldacre, Ben

Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

What's Going On in This Graph? Online College - The New York Times

Subgroup analyses may be misleading, If conclusions are made that a treatment is effective based on subgroup analysis alone, those conclusions may well be misleading. Read the full

Heterogeneity in meta-analysis - Students 4 Best Evidence

Understanding statistical significance of subgroups in the data science era - Research Outreach

Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial - Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health

Information, Free Full-Text

IJERPH, Free Full-Text

Three simple rules to ensure reasonably credible subgroup analyses

Applied Sciences, Free Full-Text